Subject 2: What is Management
P & gt ; p & gt ;Is there one best ‘style ‘ of direction? Why or why non?
In my sentiment, a individual best ‘style ‘ of direction does non be. The ground being that administrations are diverse and complex entities. Directors must larn the nature and characteristics of an administration and develop a manner of direction which is best suited for that peculiar ‘climate ‘ . What may be the ‘best ‘ manner in one company can neglect stunningly in another. The manner of direction which directors choose to use depends on many factors, the main one being the employees. The response of the employees to a peculiar manner of direction is the most of import index of its success. Basically, direction is about organizing the activities of employees so that maximal efficiency and effectivity is attained. For directors, there is a tough determination sing the manner of direction: liberty or command? The reply lies in the quality of the employees. In some instances, employees are self-motivated and would work more efficaciously without a tight rein, while in others, autonomy would interpret to bludging. It is the director ‘s undertaking to strike the balance and make up one’s mind which manner of direction would bring forth the best result. Naturally, this leads to alone manners of direction which are adapted to different administrations, and therefore, a best manner of direction does non be.
Write a 200 word ( max. ) sum-up of statement from Cunliffe ( 2009 ) .
The chief statement that Cunliffe makes in this article is that direction and direction individualities can non be defined in concrete footings. He argues that there is a clear differentiation between the theories of direction and the existent pattern. Management individualities should non be confined to the rigidnesss of established historical theories. The assorted critical analyses which purport a peculiar manner of direction merely function to restrain managerial actions and individualities. Cunliffe argues the nature of direction is dynamic and shaped through interaction. His position takes leave from the traditional, which tends to offer fixed representations on the ‘best ‘ manner of direction.
What are the cardinal issues in the instance survey ‘Surviving the Boss from Hell? ‘
One of the cardinal issues in the instance survey is the relationship between the employee and the director. It is obvious that the relationship between David and his foreman is an unhealthy one. It appears that David ‘s foreman has neglected the interpersonal functions which directors should take on. This has resulted in a negative working environment where employees have low satisfaction and morale. One employee, Marissa, pretends to be ‘insanely tender ‘ merely to avoid work. Such attitude reflects a deficiency of motive and by and large means less productiveness. This instance analyze high spots the impact of bad direction on the employees of an administration. The evident deficiency of concern for the ‘underlings ‘ has injured David ‘s demand for upward mobility. It has besides reduced employee battle and public presentation. Besides mentioned in this instance survey is the political facet of a workplace. Blatant favoritism is exhibited by the foreman as the houseman is praised for a little part to the company.